Add to Google




http://www.wikio.com

BLN RSS

Twitter



Alternative News,
Information, and Analysis

Rogue Government
What Really Happened
Cryptogon
Raw Story
Citizens for Legit Gov.
Information Clearing House
American Free Press
Global Research
The Peoples Voice
Tom Burghardt
Uncover The News
All Gov.
Media Monarchy
Information Liberation
TPM Muckraker
F. William Engdahl
Cryptome
Narco News
Media Matters
Uruknet
Corbett Report
Common Dreams
Alternet
Antiwar
Aftermath News
Steve Quayle
Wayne Madsen
Truth Out
Etherzone
Online Journal
Lew Rockwell
Dissident Voice
News With Views
Jeff Rense
Strike The Root
Peter Chamberlin
Dprogram
12160
Old Thinker News
Common Dreams
Empire Burlesque
American Exile
CNS News
IntelliBreifs
Electric Politics
Stop The Lie
Amy de Miceli
Crooks and Liars
Rumor Mill News
The Resident
Aangirfan
OpEDNews
The Brad Blog
Conspiracy Archive
Foreign Policy Journal
Counter Punch
August Review
Buzzflash
Truth Is Treason
NewsWires
News Now
My Way News
Reuters Alert Net
1st Headlines
Yahoo News
Ananova
Excite AP
Knight Ridder
Newsday AP
Google News
Swiss Info
ABC Wire
News Interactive
US Newswire
World News Network
United Press Int.
Associated Press
Excite News
MSN News
PR Newswire
Reuters
Scripps Howard
Xinhua
ZD Net
Online Only
Natural News
Real News Network
VOA News
Huffington Post
World Net Daily
Drudge Report
Newsmax
Boing Boing
Short News
Small Government Times
Capitol Hill Blue
Global Post
Business / Economics
Seeking Alpha
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Funny Money Report
Market Oracle
Money Morning
The Street
Shadow Stats
Economist
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Kitco
Gold Eagle
Max Keiser
321 Gold
Stock Charts
Zero Hedge
Washingtons's Blog
The Daily Reckoning
Energy Business Review
Milplex / Intel / Defense
Danger Room
Washington Technology
Defense Industry Daily
Global Security
Geopolitical Monitor
Defense Link
Stratfor
Space War
Jane's
Defense Tech
Strategy Page
Military Info Tech
Major US Newspapers
New York Times
New York Post
New York Daily News
Washington Post
Washington Times
L.A. Times
USA Today
Science / Tech News
Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Engadget
New Scientist
Technovelgy
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World
VNU Net
Satire & Animation
Onion YouTube
Reptile God
Wahoos Mopar Grave Yard
Royal Canadian Air Farce
The Daily Show
The Colbert Report
Mark Fiore
All Hat No Cattle
Mack White
Propaganda Remix Project
Internet Weekly Report
Kontraband
Holy Lemon


oracle broadcasting









AddThis Feed Button
FKN NEWZ Texas Team Speak
Add to Technorati Favorites
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional






Military Industrial Complex

Microsoft to aid in war on terror, builds software for DHS
Published on 11-23-2008Email To Friend    Print Version
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Source: ARS Technica

Microsoft and GIS vendor ESRI have announced that they are constructing a suite of collaboration tools for intelligence gathering and processing, intended for deployment at the Department of Homeland Security's national fusion centers. The software is built on top of Microsoft's SharePoint server platform and ESRI's ArcGIS Advanced Enterprise server. 

The software will include a "situational awareness portal" with location-based RSS feeds and XML map overlay data. The information that is managed by the system will be made accessible to intelligence analysts through SharePoint. Microsoft says that the framework will be extensible and can be customized to meet additional, unforeseen needs. The bundle also includes terabytes of prerendered satellite imagery that can be used with mapping software. Microsoft plans to expand the scope of the system and use its components to provide a broader and more comprehensive technology solution for security applications.

The fusion center concept was conceived by the 9/11 Commission as part of a strategy that would streamline communication and intelligence sharing among various federal intelligence agencies and state law enforcement. The fusion centers, which are housed in high-security facilities across the country, provide government officials with a venue to collaborate on collection, analysis, and distribution of sensitive intelligence information.

Although the original function of the centers was to empower counterterrorism activity, the mandate has broadened to encompass virtually any perceived threat and the centers themselves are operated with minimal oversight and virtually no public scrutiny. The federal government has pushed aggressively to encourage passage of state laws that would block meaningful oversight of fusion centers in a variety of ways, including making their databases exempt from FOIA requests.

These centers, which will be used as local clearinghouses for intelligence data and surveillance operations, absolutely must have the most secure and reliable software available. Let's digress for a moment and look at some of the reasons why.

A study conducted by the Government Accountability Office last year found 788 documented instances of federal database security breaches between 2003 and 2006. For obvious reasons, it's particularly bad when sensitive intelligence databases get hacked. It's also particularly damaging to the individuals whose information is stored in the databases, because they have no idea what personal data might be in there—some national security databases that are maintained by the government are completely exempt from the disclosure and accountability provisions of the Privacy Act. In a statement to Congress last year, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned that victims are not informed and have no opportunity to mitigate potential identity theft when these databases are compromised by hackers.

The Office of the Inspector General also produced a report that complained about the large number of inaccuracies in the national terrorist screening database. Errors are a very big concern because law enforcement databases communicate with each other and propagate information in very complex ways. If the systems in the fusion centers don't meet the highest standards for reliability, they could introduce new errors into government data and propagate those errors broadly throughout any number of other intelligence and law enforcement computer systems.

With all of these extreme privacy, security, and reliability risks, the government has to set very high standards for the software that it adopts for fusion centers. So, people will naturally question the choice of Microsoft, as the company's reputation for delivering secure software has been tarnished by a number of past lapses.

In any case, Microsoft focused on the software's functionality, rather than issues with the databases. "Our police forces, sheriff departments and fusion center managers are increasingly relying on collaboration tools that help them connect the dots in a world of asymmetrical threats," said Microsoft state and local government manager Gail Thomas-Flynn. "Microsoft and ESRI's FusionX Appliance provides the layman-to-expert-level technology that can facilitate the intake, analysis, visualization and dissemination of information to the right person, at the right time, in the right place."

Microsoft's mixed reputation for security aside, it's actually a relief to see law enforcement agencies leveraging existing commercial software rather than trying to roll their own. Anything will be an improvement on the FBI's virtual case file system, which cost over $170 million and had to be scrapped after only a week of use because it was so dysfunctional.