Add to Google




http://www.wikio.com

BLN RSS

Twitter



Alternative News,
Information, and Analysis

Rogue Government
What Really Happened
Cryptogon
Raw Story
Citizens for Legit Gov.
Information Clearing House
American Free Press
Global Research
The Peoples Voice
Tom Burghardt
Uncover The News
All Gov.
Media Monarchy
Information Liberation
TPM Muckraker
F. William Engdahl
Cryptome
Narco News
Media Matters
Uruknet
Corbett Report
Common Dreams
Alternet
Antiwar
Aftermath News
Steve Quayle
Wayne Madsen
Truth Out
Etherzone
Online Journal
Lew Rockwell
Dissident Voice
News With Views
Jeff Rense
Strike The Root
Peter Chamberlin
Dprogram
12160
Old Thinker News
Common Dreams
Empire Burlesque
American Exile
CNS News
IntelliBreifs
Electric Politics
Stop The Lie
Amy de Miceli
Crooks and Liars
Rumor Mill News
The Resident
Aangirfan
OpEDNews
The Brad Blog
Conspiracy Archive
Foreign Policy Journal
Counter Punch
August Review
Buzzflash
Truth Is Treason
NewsWires
News Now
My Way News
Reuters Alert Net
1st Headlines
Yahoo News
Ananova
Excite AP
Knight Ridder
Newsday AP
Google News
Swiss Info
ABC Wire
News Interactive
US Newswire
World News Network
United Press Int.
Associated Press
Excite News
MSN News
PR Newswire
Reuters
Scripps Howard
Xinhua
ZD Net
Online Only
Natural News
Real News Network
VOA News
Huffington Post
World Net Daily
Drudge Report
Newsmax
Boing Boing
Short News
Small Government Times
Capitol Hill Blue
Global Post
Business / Economics
Seeking Alpha
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Funny Money Report
Market Oracle
Money Morning
The Street
Shadow Stats
Economist
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Kitco
Gold Eagle
Max Keiser
321 Gold
Stock Charts
Zero Hedge
Washingtons's Blog
The Daily Reckoning
Energy Business Review
Milplex / Intel / Defense
Danger Room
Washington Technology
Defense Industry Daily
Global Security
Geopolitical Monitor
Defense Link
Stratfor
Space War
Jane's
Defense Tech
Strategy Page
Military Info Tech
Major US Newspapers
New York Times
New York Post
New York Daily News
Washington Post
Washington Times
L.A. Times
USA Today
Science / Tech News
Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Engadget
New Scientist
Technovelgy
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World
VNU Net
Satire & Animation
Onion YouTube
Reptile God
Wahoos Mopar Grave Yard
Royal Canadian Air Farce
The Daily Show
The Colbert Report
Mark Fiore
All Hat No Cattle
Mack White
Propaganda Remix Project
Internet Weekly Report
Kontraband
Holy Lemon


oracle broadcasting









AddThis Feed Button
FKN NEWZ Texas Team Speak
Add to Technorati Favorites
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional







The Bill Nobody Noticed: National DNA Databank
Published on 10-20-2009Email To Friend    Print Version
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Source: Natural News

In April of 2008, President Bush signed into law S.1858 which allows the federal government to screen the DNA of all newborn babies in the U.S. This was to be implemented within 6 months meaning that this collection is now being carried out. Congressman Ron Paul states that this bill is the first step towards the establishment of a national DNA database.

S.1858, known as The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007, is justified as a "national contingency plan" in that it represents preparation for any sort of public health emergency. The bill states that the federal government should "continue to carry out, coordinate, and expand research in newborn screening" and "maintain a central clearinghouse of current information on newborn screening... ensuring that the clearinghouse is available on the Internet and is updated at least quarterly". Sections of the bill also make it clear that DNA may be used in genetic experiments and tests. Read the full bill: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bil...

Twila Brase, president of the Citizens' Council on Health Care warns that this new law represents the beginning of nationwide genetic testing. Brase states that S.1858 and H.R. 3825, the House version of the bill, will:
• Establish a national list of genetic conditions for which newborns and children are to be tested.
• Establish protocols for the linking and sharing of genetic test results nationwide.
• Build surveillance systems for tracking the health status and health outcomes of individuals diagnosed at birth with a genetic defect or trait.
• Use the newborn screening program as an opportunity for government agencies to identify, list, and study "secondary conditions" of individuals and their families.
• Subject citizens to genetic research without their knowledge or consent.
Read her entire analysis of the implications of this bill here: http://www.cchconline.org/pdf/S_185...

Brase states that under this bill, "The DNA taken at birth from every citizen is essentially owned by the government, and every citizen becomes a potential subject of government-sponsored genetic research." All 50 states are now routinely providing results of genetic screenings to the Department of Homeland Security and this bill will establish the legality of that practice plus include DNA.

Ron Paul has also vigorously argued against this bill making the following comments before the US House of Representatives:
"I cannot support legislation...that exceeds the Constitutional limitations on federal power or in any way threatens the liberty of the American people. I must oppose it."

"S. 1858 gives the federal bureaucracy the authority to develop a model newborn screening program. Madame Speaker, the federal government lacks both the constitutional authority and the competence to develop a newborn screening program adequate for a nation as large and diverse as the United States. …"

"Those of us in the medical profession should be particularly concerned about policies allowing government officials and state-favored interests to access our medical records without our consent … My review of S. 1858 indicates the drafters of the legislation made no effort to ensure these newborn screening programs do not violate the privacy rights of parents and children, in fact, by directing federal bureaucrats to create a contingency plan for newborn screening in the event of a 'public health' disaster, this bill may lead to further erosions of medical privacy. As recent history so eloquently illustrates, politicians are more than willing to take, and people are more than willing to cede, liberty during times of 'emergency."